Call for Papers: Online Dispute Resolution (ODR 2010)

Things I Want When I'm a Lawyer 2
Image by hartboy via Flickr

6th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR 2010) at JURIX 2010,

Liverpool, United Kingdom, December 15 2010

As part of the JURIX 2010 conference in Liverpool UK, we will hold a Workshop on Online dispute resolution.  This workshop is a follow on from successful workshops at JURIX 2008 and ICAIL 2009.

Website: http://idt.uab.es/workshops/ODR2010/

Organizers:

Brooke Abrahams, Brooke.Abrahams@vu.edu.au

Marta Poblet,  marta.poblet@uab.cat

John Zeleznikow, John.Zeleznikow@vu.edu.au

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) continues to be a fertile domain breeding new approaches on how to manage disputes online. Recent developments regarding the Web 2.0, the Semantic Web, and the mobile Web open up an emerging paradigm based on consumer-oriented services, collaboration, open standards and interoperability. Yet, ODR initiatives need to balance these trends with critical requirements such as reputation, trust, confidentiality, privacy and enforceability.

As in the previous five editions of the Workshop, the 6th International ODR Workshop aims at offering a forum for the exchange of ideas and projects between people with different backgrounds, such as providers of ODR-services, researchers in the fields of ADR/ODR, law, argumentation, negotiation and AI & Law as well as practitioners, justice experts and others.

Topics covered:

  • Argumentation and ODR
  • Decision support for ODR
  • Theories of dispute resolution and ODR
  • Modeling and designing of ODR systems
  • Tools and techniques for assisted negotiation, automated negotiation, online mediation, and online arbitration
  • Empirical research on ODR use cases and projects
  • ODR in e-commerce
  • ODR in e-government
  • ODR and e-justice
  • ODR in peace-building processes
  • ODR in online communities
  • Mobile ODR
  • Reputation issues in ODR
  • Psychological and cognitive factors in ODR
  • ODR protocols and standards
  • Legal issues in ODR

Submission information:

  • Authors are invited to submit both papers up to a maximum of 5000 words, and position papers of approximately 500 words
  • Camera-ready papers should be in Springer Word format (based on lecture notes computer science series), and with a length of 10 to 15 pages. A Word template may be found here.
  • Send your proposals by mail (idt@uab.cat)

Deadlines:

  • November 10th: paper submission by e-mail (idt at uab.es)
  • November 20th: notification of acceptance
  • November 30th: final papers due

Programme Committee (Preliminary)

  • Brooke Abrahams, School of Management and Information Systems, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Jeff Aresty, The Internet Bar
  • Emilia Bellucci, School of Management and Information Systems, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Pompeu Casanovas, Institute of Law and Technology, Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • Ethan Katsh, National Center for Technology and Dispute Resolution, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA
  • Arno R. Lodder, Centre for Electronic Dispute Resolution, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Barbara Madonik, Unicom Communication Consultants Inc
  • Orna Rabinovich Einy, Haifa Center of Law & Technology
  • Laurens Mommers, Law School, University of Leiden
  • Pablo Noriega, Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, CSIC, Spain
  • Marta Poblet, Institute of Law and Technology, Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • Colin Rule, ODR at eBay, San Jose, USA
  • Uri Schild, Bar Ilan University, Israel
  • Douglas N. Walton, University of Windsor, Canada
  • John Zeleznikow, School of Management and Information Systems, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
Enhanced by Zemanta
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedin

Call for Papers: Modelling Legal Cases and Legal Rules

Keeble v Hickeringill
Image via Wikipedia

Modelling Legal Cases and Legal Rules

As part of the Jurix 2010 conference in Liverpool UK, we will hold a Workshop on Modelling Legal Cases and Legal Rules. This workshop is a follow on from successful workshops at Jurix 2007 and ICAIL 2009.

Legal cases and legal rules in common law contexts have been modelled in a variety of ways over the course of research in AI and Law to support different styles of reasoning for a variety of problem-solving contexts, such as decision-making, information retrieval, teaching, etc. Particular legal topic areas and cases have received wide coverage in the AI and Law literature including wild animals (e.g. Pierson v. Post, Young v. Hitchens, and Keeble v. Hickeringill), intellectual property (e.g. Mason v. Jack Daniel Distillery), and evidence (e.g. the Rijkbloem case). As well, some legal rules have been widely discussed, such as legal argument schemes (e.g. Expert Testimony) or rules of evidence (see Walton 2002). However, other areas have been less well covered. For example, there appears to be less research on modelling legal cases in civil law contexts; investigation of taxonomies and ontologies of legal rules would support abstraction and formalisation (see Sherwin 2009); additional legal rules could be brought under the scope of investigation, such as those bearing on criminal assault or causes of action.

The aim of this workshop is to provide a forum in which researchers can present their research on modelling legal cases and legal rules.

Papers are solicited that model a particular legal case or a small set of legal rules. Authors are free to choose the case or set of legal rules and analyse them according to the authors’ preferred model of representation; any theoretical discussion should be grounded in or exemplified by the case or rules at hand. Papers should make clear what are the particular distinctive features of their approach and why these features are useful in modelling the chosen case or rules. The workshop is an opportunity for authors to demonstrate the benefits of their approach and for group discussions to identify useful overlapping features as well as aspects to be further explored and developed.

All submissions should be emailed as a PDF attachment to the workshop organiser, Adam Wyner, at: adam@wyner.info.

See the workshop website for more information.

Programme Committee (Preliminary)

Dates
Paper submission: Friday, November 5, 2010
Accepted Notification: Friday, November 12, 2010
Workshop Registration: Friday, November 19, 2010
December 15th, 2010 Jurix Workshops/Tutorials
December 16th-17th, 2010 Jurix 2010 Main Conference

By Adam Wyner
Distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0

Enhanced by Zemanta
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedin

Jurix 2010: Accepted Papers

The following papers have been accepted for the Jurix 2010 conference. Out of 36 submissions, we accepted 13 full papers of 10 pages, which is 36% and an additional 9 short papers of 4 pages.

FULL PAPERS (10 pages)
Trevor Bench-Capon and Henry Prakken. A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation
Matthias Grabmair and Kevin D. Ashley. Argumentation with Value Judgments – An Example in Hypothetical Reasoning
Clara Smith, Antonino Rotolo and Giovanni Sartor. Representations of Time within Normative MAS
Giacomo Bartoloni and Enrico Francesconi. Sharing Knowledge by Conceptual Mapping: the case of EU Thesaural Interoperability
Adam Wyner and Wim Peters. Lexical Semantics and Expert Legal Knowledge towards the Identification of Legal Case Factors
Michał Araszkiewicz. Balancing of Legal Principles and Constraint Satisfaction
Alexander Boer and Tom van Engers. Generic Problem Solving Tasks and Agent Roles in Public Administration
Marc van Opijnen. Canonicalizing Complex Case Law Citations
Floris Bex and Douglas Walton. Burdens and Standards of Proof for Inference to the Best Explanation
Emile de Maat, Kai Krabben and Radboud Winkels. Machine Learning versus Knowledge Based Classification of Legal Texts
Guido Governatori and giovanni Sartor. Burdens of proof in monological argumentation
Kenji Takano, Makoto Nakamura, Yoshiko Oyama and Akira Shimazu. Semantic Analysis of Paragraphs Consisting of Multiple Sentences — Towards Development of a Logical Formulation System —
Rinke Hoekstra, Arno Lodder and Frank van Harmelen. Case Frames as Contextual Mappings to Case Law in BestPortal
SHORT PAPERS (4 pages)
Burkhard Schafer. Interagency data exchange protocols as computational data protection law
Edward Hermann Haeusler, Valeria de Paiva and Alexandre Rademaker. Dealing with Conflict of Laws in Private International Law by Means of Intuitionistic Description Logic: A Sequent Calculus based case-study
Minh Pham, Minh Nguyen and Akira Shimazu. Update Legal Documents Using Hierarchical Ranking Models and Word Clustering
Daniel Gorin, Sergio Mera and Fernando Schapachnik. Model Checking Legal Documents
Monica Palmirani, Guido Governatori and Giuseppe Contissa. Temporal Dimensions in the Rules: an Evolution of LKIF Rule
Henok Sahilu and Solomon Atnafu. Towards Measuring User Query Tendency for Legal Document Retrieval
Peter Condliffe, Brooke Abrahams and John Zeleznikow. A Legal Decision Support Guide for Owners Corporation Cases
Ermo Täks and Ahti Lohk. An alternative method for computerized legal text restructuring
Shawn Bayern. A Formal System for Analyzing Conveyances of Property Under the Common Law
Enhanced by Zemanta
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedin